Abstract

We compare LTE coverage data from the FCC with a crowdsourced dataset from Skyhook for New Mexico. While the two coverage datasets tend to agree in urban areas, there is significant disparity, up to 15%, in rural and tribal census blocks. On-ground LTE coverage measurements collected across 120 miles of rural and tribal New Mexico indicate that even the crowdsourced data exhibits over-reporting, although to a lesser degree than the FCC data. The findings make a case for including mechanisms to validate ISP-reported FCC coverage data. While crowdsourcing is a good alternative, targeted active measurement campaigns are needed in areas where existing crowdsource datasets are sparse.

Related Insights

Working Paper

Best Practices for Collecting Speed Test Data

A set of recommendations for gathering and analyzing crowdsourced speed test measurements to support broadband investment allocation.
Aug 12, 2022
Working Paper

Internet Inequity in Chicago: Adoption, Affordability, and Availability

A study of Internet equity in Chicago that considers disparities in Internet availability, affordability, and adoption across urban communities.
Aug 08, 2022
Working Paper

Benchmarks or Equity? A New Approach to Measuring Internet Performance

A new approach to measuring Internet performance that rests on comparisons of multiple performance metrics across geographies.
Aug 03, 2022