Abstract

We compare LTE coverage data from the FCC with a crowdsourced dataset from Skyhook for New Mexico. While the two coverage datasets tend to agree in urban areas, there is significant disparity, up to 15%, in rural and tribal census blocks. On-ground LTE coverage measurements collected across 120 miles of rural and tribal New Mexico indicate that even the crowdsourced data exhibits over-reporting, although to a lesser degree than the FCC data. The findings make a case for including mechanisms to validate ISP-reported FCC coverage data. While crowdsourcing is a good alternative, targeted active measurement campaigns are needed in areas where existing crowdsource datasets are sparse.

Related Insights

Working Paper

A First Look at the Spatial and Temporal Variability of Internet Performance Data in Hyperlocal Geographies

Our ongoing research seeks to address these issues by developing innovative sampling methods and statistical models to provide a more...
Sep 19, 2023
Working Paper

Estimating WebRTC Video QoE Metrics Without Using Application Headers

This paper considers whether we can use more standard features in the network traffic, namely the IP and UDP headers,...
Sep 19, 2023
Working Paper

Best Practices for Collecting Speed Test Data

A set of recommendations for gathering and analyzing crowdsourced speed test measurements to support broadband investment allocation.
Aug 12, 2022